![]() ![]() ![]() Why people display the fundamental attribution error Note: the term ‘fundamental attribution error’ was coined by Stanford professor Lee Ross in a 1977 paper titled “The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process”, where Ross discusses this phenomenon based on findings from earlier studies. This remains the case even when students recognize that their own actions, such as misbehavior, intentional provoking, or lack of effort, are what caused the teacher to become angry in the first place. Essentially, this means that students assume that the main reason why their teachers are angry is that they’re angry people, rather than that their environment has caused the teachers to become angry. Students often display the fundamental attribution error, when they overestimate internal causes for their teachers’ expression of anger.Furthermore, this effect has been shown to remain consistent even when the person who displays the fundamental attribution error watches the same actor playing two different roles in such cases, the last scene that people view is generally the one that determines their evaluation of the actor. Essentially, this means that people sometimes assume that an actor’s behavior while in-character reflects their true personality, rather than what is dictated for them by the script. People watching TV shows often display the fundamental attribution error, when they attribute the behavior of actors on the show to their personality, rather than to the script.For instance, additional examples of the fundamental attribution error include the following: Since then, other research has found evidence of the fundamental attribution error in various domains. These findings were replicated in a follow-up experiment, where participants read what they thought was an initial draft of an opening statement for a college debate on the topic. The experiment provided evidence of the fundamental attribution error, since participants who read the Pro-Castro essay were significantly more likely to assume that the student who wrote it was himself Pro-Castro, compared to those who read the Anti-Castro essay, even when they were told that the student who wrote the essay had no choice with regard to its topic. Some participants received a Pro-Castro essay and others an Anti-Castro one, and they were all asked to judge the true attitude of the essay writer toward the topic. In the first and best-known of the experiments in the study, participants were given what they thought was an essay written by a student for a political science exam on a controversial topic-Fidel Castro’s Cuba. One notable example of the fundamental attribution error appears in the first study that focused on this phenomenon, published in 1967 by Edward Jones and Victor Harris, two researchers at Duke University. Caveats regarding the fundamental attribution errorĮxamples of the fundamental attribution error. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |